Thursday, January 1, 2009

Re-upping of Podcast #4

For some reason the podcast went down a lot earlier than previously so here it is again if you missed it:

https://www.yousendit.com/download/TTZsanZrdVVCTWwzZUE9PQ

Oh, and here's an article that you can file under 'How The Monarchy Undermines Democracy':
In Canada, if you want to suspend the parliament (perhaps you want to avoid a vote of no-confidence, for instance) the Prime Minister has to get the permission of the Queen, which, in this case she granted:

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE4B34BC20081204

"Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper won a rare suspension of Parliament on Thursday, managing to avoid being ousted by opposition parties angry over the minority Conservative government's economic plans and an attempt to cut off party financing.

Governor General Michaelle Jean -- the representative of Queen Elizabeth, Canada's head of state -- agreed to Harper's request to shut down Parliament until Jan 26. Parliament was reconvened just weeks ago after the October 14 election."

And here's some of the minimal news coverage from the, obviously minor, collapse of a European government a few weeks ago:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/belgium/3904207/Belgium-government-collapse-King-asks-former-PM-for-help.html


dp


Happy New Year!

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Podcast #4

A brand new podcast has just spewed straight out of my mouth and into the digital ether! It's here:

20.12.08 - Haagcore #4: Sinterklaas - https://www.yousendit.com/download/TTZra0ZSZEttNExIRGc9PQ

It includes such things as an exploration of the dutch origins of Christmas traditions, some poetry and even a specially written christmas song. Hope you enjoy it. I'm back in Lincoln on Monday.

Also, Spot The Difference:
America:

Britain:



<---------PODCAST SPOILER ALERT!!!-------->

Oh, and if your wondering what I'm talking about in the podcast when I mention people blacked-up in 15th Century Spanish clothing, I'm talking about this:


Also, here's some pictures of the rioting in Greece:
Information: http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml
Pictures: http://athens.indymedia.org/front.php3?lang=en&article_id=933804

dp

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Advertising Statistics

I recently rediscovered an advert I have been trying to find for ages because it is a classic example of the spurious use of misleading figures in advertising and really irritated me when I saw it many months ago. It recently appeared very briefly in Charlie Brooker's advertising edition of Screenwipe.

The product is L'Oreal Collegen Replumper and one thing that struck me the first time I saw it is the very odd numbers used to justify the products claims, as seen in the screenshot below:



Firstly, 217 women is a ridiculously small control group for testing a naturally distributed cosmetic product.

Secondly, the figures don't add up:
"Plumps and Smooths, 81% agree" out of "217 women tested"
Let's do the math:
How much is 81% of 217?:
81/100=0.81
0.81 x 217= 175.77 women.

175.77 women agree?
175.77 women?!

OK, maybe this isn't fair: if a survey is taken, some women may choose not to answer the question, in which case, they would not be counted as one of the 81%, even though they could be counted as one of the 217. In this case we can work out the amount of women who agreed with the statement by multiplying 0.81 by every number between 217 and 1 and finding out which numbers give non-decimal integers:
No. of women tested 81% of No. of women tested
No. of women tested 81% of No. of women tested
217 175.77
97 78.57
216 174.96
96 77.76
215 174.15
95 76.95
214 173.34
94 76.14
213 172.53
93 75.33
212 171.72
92 74.52
211 170.91
91 73.71
210 170.1
90 72.9
209 169.29
89 72.09
208 168.48
88 71.28
207 167.67
87 70.47
206 166.86
86 69.66
205 166.05
85 68.85
204 165.24
84 68.04
203 164.43
83 67.23
202 163.62
82 66.42
201 162.81
81 65.61
200 162
80 64.8
199 161.19
79 63.99
198 160.38
78 63.18
197 159.57
77 62.37
196 158.76
76 61.56
195 157.95
75 60.75
194 157.14
74 59.94
193 156.33
73 59.13
192 155.52
72 58.32
191 154.71
71 57.51
190 153.9
70 56.7
189 153.09
69 55.89
188 152.28
68 55.08
187 151.47
67 54.27
186 150.66
66 53.46
185 149.85
65 52.65
184 149.04
64 51.84
183 148.23
63 51.03
182 147.42
62 50.22
181 146.61
61 49.41
180 145.8
60 48.6
179 144.99
59 47.79
178 144.18
58 46.98
177 143.37
57 46.17
176 142.56
56 45.36
175 141.75
55 44.55
174 140.94
54 43.74
173 140.13
53 42.93
172 139.32
52 42.12
171 138.51
51 41.31
170 137.7
50 40.5
169 136.89
49 39.69
168 136.08
48 38.88
167 135.27
47 38.07
166 134.46
46 37.26
165 133.65
45 36.45
164 132.84
44 35.64
163 132.03
43 34.83
162 131.22
42 34.02
161 130.41
41 33.21
160 129.6
40 32.4
159 128.79
39 31.59
158 127.98
38 30.78
157 127.17
37 29.97
156 126.36
36 29.16
155 125.55
35 28.35
154 124.74
34 27.54
153 123.93
33 26.73
152 123.12
32 25.92
151 122.31
31 25.11
150 121.5
30 24.3
149 120.69
29 23.49
148 119.88
28 22.68
147 119.07
27 21.87
146 118.26
26 21.06
145 117.45
25 20.25
144 116.64
24 19.44
143 115.83
23 18.63
142 115.02
22 17.82
141 114.21
21 17.01
140 113.4
20 16.2
139 112.59
19 15.39
138 111.78
18 14.58
137 110.97
17 13.77
136 110.16
16 12.96
135 109.35
15 12.15
134 108.54
14 11.34
133 107.73
13 10.53
132 106.92
12 9.72
131 106.11
11 8.91
130 105.3
10 8.1
129 104.49
9 7.29
128 103.68
8 6.48
127 102.87
7 5.67
126 102.06
6 4.86
125 101.25
5 4.05
124 100.44
4 3.24
123 99.63
3 2.43
122 98.82
2 1.62
121 98.01
1 0.81
120 97.2


119 96.39


118 95.58


117 94.77


116 93.96


115 93.15


114 92.34


113 91.53


112 90.72


111 89.91


110 89.1


109 88.29


108 87.48


107 86.67


106 85.86


105 85.05


104 84.24


103 83.43


102 82.62


101 81.81


100 81


99 80.19


98 79.38




As you can see by the chart above, the only possible number of women who could have agreed with the statement are either 200 women or 100 women; either 17 or 117 less than their advert implies: that's either 7.83% or 53.91% less - bringing the possibly of a major discrepancy between the figures presented and the actual 'research' carried out!

Needless to say, I should get out more.

dp

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Podcast #3

Here's the next installment:
Haagcore #3 - Herfstvakantie:
https://www.yousendit.com/download/Y2ovUWVvQTZoMlhIRGc9PQ
Sorry if you've been waiting for it but these things take a while to get recorded.

Hope you enjoy it.

I'm all in a bundle of excitement for the Huddersfield Festival...

dp

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Some Dutch Advice

A Dutch friend has just given me the most brilliant explanation (using the power of metaphor) as to why the legalisation of cannabis makes, sense compared to banning it, and I just HAD to share it with you:

If parents say to their children: "do not build a fire in the house while we are out", they will come back and find their house burnt down. But, if they say to their children "you are allowed to build a fire in the garden", then they will come back to find both house and garden unsinged.

That is all,

dp

coming soon: podcast featuring; ontbijt koek, the economy, Markets, Greg Chops' Diet, and much, much more.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

It's been far too long...

Imagine my horror upon discovering that, after my initial burst of blogging euphoria, it had been more than a month from my last posting. I quickly strove to correct this, creating the following (the accompanying podcast will be uploaded in a few days):

Back at the end of October was half term, which saw me visiting Ghent, probably the most beautiful place I've ever visited (apart from under my duvet in the early hours). Below I present a picture of what could possibly be the most ornate Fish Market in the world:Imagine buying your halibut from that! Also, you can see what I would describe as 'Beautiful building overkill': a cathedral, a bell tower and a large church right next to each other:


























The two buildings below (notice the tower of the large church to the left of the belltower) were the other side of a square from the badboy above. Ghent seems to like packing its punches in nice and tight: The Cathedral was ornate to a scale that puts Lincoln to shame and features not only a Rubens' painting (which was pretty mind blowing) but also a Van Eyck.


























And here's a picture of the castle:
In blogging, as in life, it never rains; it pisses it down so hard you get pneumonia. So here's some more things for your eyes and mind:

An interesting thing about The Netherlands is that most of their beers are imported from Belgium, because the people in that country have an uncanny knack of making good stuff. Last month I discovered a brand which I have not seen anywhere since: Piraat (or pirate, in english) beer: http://www.vansteenberge.com/htm/2en/21200en.htm. It's 10.5% vol. (would pirates drink anything less? I think not!) and according to the linked website "This is a world-class amber colored beer. American beer connoisseurs give it 98 out of 100. No other beer scores better." It is unprovable and probably fictitious phrases like this that the large, unregulated and unrefrerenced network like the world wide web was designed for. It's also interesting to note that on the same website the beer Augustijn is described as: "It is somewhat less well-known, but according to beer enthusiasts without a doubt the best and finest beer made by brewery Van Steenberge." So who knows which is best.

I found out yesterday that one millionth of a century is only 52 minutes. How many millionths of a century have you wasted today?

The American election, eh? You can tell it's going to be a good government when someone is voted for simply because they're not somebody else. Not that I'd know anything about it; due to my mistrust of the Corporate News-Media I only get my American political information via Stephen Colbert...

And finally: Belgium had a revolution! In 1830! After an opera! Now there's something they don't teach you in school. (Probably because they're to busy teaching you about the Nazis and the wrongs of every other country in the world apart from our own). Which reminds me about a fantastic I saw on TV a while ago and recently rewatched. It suggests that the First World War was really a war over oil, being that the first British troops of the war were despatched in the Middle East rather than in Europe; that Germany was attempting to build a massive railway line to transport oil from there and that this would spell trouble for a British Navy which had just switched from oil to gas. (Also it's not really believable that any country would put massive amounts of time and resources into defending a country as economically insignificant and resource bereft as Belgium (no matter how good their beer and chocolate is)). The video is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQhhrzHKMhI. It's in 9 parts.

The program also explains the Euro/Dollar theory for the invasion of Iraq - something I didn't give much creedence to until I remembered the amount of countries that America had 'intervened' in during the 20th Century:
1911 - Mexico (supported insurection of pro-British Fransisco Madero)
1912 - Mexico (supported insurection against now anti-American Fransisco Madero . By 1914 Mexico was in Civil War)
1915 - Haiti
1916 - Dominican Republic (pro-American Dictatorship implemented)
1917 - Cuba (pro-American dictatorship implemented)
1950 - Korea
1953 - Iran (Britain and US backed overthrow of elected president and pro-West despot installed)
1954 - Guatemala (CIA topples elected president Jacobo Arbenz Guzman and pro-American leader installed)
1961 - Cuba (Bay Of Pigs)
1964 - Vietnam
1970 - Chile (Nixon asks CIA to look into the possibility of a coup d'etat)
1973 - Chile (coup d'etat occurs, though American involvement debatable)
1981 - Nicaragua (Reagan authorizes a covert CIA force made of Nicuraguan exiles with the aim of overthrowing the government)
1983 - Grenada (invasion against Marxists)
1985 - Poland (backs anti-Soviet efforts ($8million a year)
1989 - Panama (invasion)
1992 - Somalia
1994 - Haiti
etc.
although, of course, all this is nothing compared to the British Empire at the height of Imperialism and Colonialism.

dp

p.s. actually it all got a bit dark and serious at the end there.

Tot ziens!

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Just your average day...

Wake up, go to a lecture, go to Rotterdam, meet Steve Reich, go home, go to bed: pretty much just your average day here in The Netherlands.

Of course, there's a reason for all of this:
Yesterday, me and a few friends headed over to Rotterdam for a concert of Steve Reich's music, which included 'Clapping Music' played by the man himself (still decked out in trademark baseball cap, even when on stage), 'Different Trains', 'Music for Pieces of Wood' and 'Tehilim'. Though being in an odd position to the stage (on a balcony that stretched towards the back left of the stage) that caused some pretty odd acoustics, the concert was pretty fantastic. 'Clapping Music' and 'Music For Pieces of Wood' in particular were wonderful and, from my position in the audience at least I could hear a whole set of different acoustic phenomena colouring the sound due to the shortness of their attacks.

Anyway, after the show, there was an interview with the man himself in the foyer and I got to ask him a question about 'Different Trains' (something along the lines of 'Why did you decide to have a live string quartet in the piece rather than having them all recorded and making it a straightforward tape piece?' Answer (something like): 'I'm interested in live instruments and when the cello and viola double the vocal samples in the recording you get a personification of the characters the samples are of'.')

We hung around a bit afterwards, asked him some more questions and got this lovely picture with the man himself: Does this look like a man who's 72?
(Maya, Christiaan, Steve Reich, Robert, me; see if you can spot one of the most influential composers of the last century?)

Apparently he's working on a piece for tape and rock 'n' roll band, called '2x5', which I think is being performed in Manchester next year, and a work for the Kronos Quartet and electronics for November 2009.

Unfortunately this is going to make very little sense to anyone who doesn't know who Steve Reich is, in which case, I suggest some youtube therapy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU23LqQ6LY4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhhIZscEE_g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMA8CRyNUMc

dp